APrIGF 2024 Session Proposal Submission Form | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part 1 - Lead Organizer | |||||||||||||||
Contact Person | |||||||||||||||
Sabhanaz Rashid Diya | |||||||||||||||
Organization / Affiliation (Please state "Individual" if appropriate) * | |||||||||||||||
Tech Global Institute | |||||||||||||||
Designation | |||||||||||||||
Executive Director | |||||||||||||||
Gender | |||||||||||||||
Female | |||||||||||||||
Economy of Residence | |||||||||||||||
Bangladesh | |||||||||||||||
Primary Stakeholder Group | |||||||||||||||
Civil Society | |||||||||||||||
List Your Organizing Partners (if any) | |||||||||||||||
Neeti Biyani Senior Advisor, Policy and Advocacy Internet Society biyani@isoc.org |
|||||||||||||||
Part 2 - Session Proposal | |||||||||||||||
Session Title | |||||||||||||||
Regulatory Resilience in the Age of Internet Fragmentation | |||||||||||||||
Session Format | |||||||||||||||
Panel Discussion (60 minutes) | |||||||||||||||
Where do you plan to organize your session? | |||||||||||||||
Onsite at the venue (with online moderator for questions and comments from remote participants) | |||||||||||||||
Specific Issues for Discussion | |||||||||||||||
In recent years, there have been increasing concerns among civil society, advocacy groups, and businesses about the myriad ways in which the Internet is being fragmented — from blocking Internet gateways to imposing legal restrictions on international data transfers. Policymakers in the Asia Pacific region have faced significant criticism for imposing rules that risk fragmentation. To mitigate this, many experts and business executives have demanded that countries adopt universal playbooks, and some have even suggested that countries emulate the EU or U.S. models to reduce regulatory discrepancies and reduce compliance costs. However, others argue that homogenization of regulatory norms risks weakening sovereignty and resilience of online communities, and only benefits corporate interests. Countries like India and Singapore have favored more divergent regulatory options, while Australia and Japan have advocated for more collaboration and consistency in governing the Internet. The panel discussion examines the tradeoffs between strengthening national sovereignty through diverse regulatory frameworks, and Internet fragmentation. By bringing together experts from government, private sector, academia, and civil society, the panel challenges the assumption behind norm-building, regulatory homogeneity and the risks of building isolated online communities. Specifically, the panel will examine the Washington and Brussels effect on APAC governments and question whether universal playbooks can, in fact, reduce the risk of fragmentation, or could ultimately undermine regulatory resilience through over-harmonization. |
|||||||||||||||
Describe the Relevance of Your Session to APrIGF | |||||||||||||||
This year’s APrIGF touches on both the evolution of digital ecosystems and the principles that govern them with hopes to build more consensus around responsible technologies. The panel discussion fits directly into this year’s theme by: (a) taking stock of different regulatory options in APAC and examining how they fit into global frameworks; (b) examining the tradeoffs between replicating regulatory models and establishing country-specific rules; (c) outlining principles that advance community resilience, while calling out those that risk fragmentation; and (d) providing an opportunity for consensus-building around Internet governance principles, particularly with emerging technologies like AI. The session also demonstrates the importance of multistakeholder, cross-regional approach to Internet governance by bringing together experts from different backgrounds. The outcome of the panel discussion is an APAC-focused white paper on building regulatory resilience in Asia Pacific and the Global Majority while avoiding Internet fragmentation. We believe the white paper will be an important conversation starter between civil society organizations and policymakers to build consensus on regulating global technologies that have a highly local impact. |
|||||||||||||||
Methodology / Agenda (Please add rows by clicking "+" on the right) | |||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Moderators & Speakers Info (Please complete where possible) | |||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Please explain the rationale for choosing each of the above contributors to the session. | |||||||||||||||
The panelists were selected because of their longstanding experience and expertise on regulatory intervention and innovation, and diversity of backgrounds. Internet fragmentation is a contested issue and we believe the different positions of the panelists will contribute towards a rich dialogue. Please find short bios below: Neeti Biyani is Senior Advisor, Policy and Advocacy at the Internet Society. She advocates for an open, global Internet globally, with a keen focus on South Asia. She developed and led ISOC’s work to defend against Internet fragmentation. She is also involved with community mobilization and public advocacy with a view to promote digital rights facilitated by a seamless Internet. William Lee is the Assistant Director, Internet Governance, within Australia’s communications ministry, where he leads on internet governance, public policy and multilateral engagement. Mr Lee is an experienced policy practitioner, previously working across various complex policy and legislative topics including international mail and e-commerce, urban planning, infrastructure, transport, and international affairs. Mr Lee holds a Bachelor of Laws (Hons) and Bachelor of Arts from the University of Queensland. Professor Kyung-Sin (K.S.) Park is one of the founders of Open Net Korea, a forum for discussion and collaboration on ICT freedoms and human rights since 2013. From 2006 through 2016, he also has served as the executive director of the PSPD Law Center, a non-profit entity that organized several high-impact litigations in the areas of free speech, privacy, and copyright in South Korea. Sabhanaz Rashid Diya is the founder of Tech Global Institute, a tech policy nonprofit focused on advancing equity and accountability for the Global Majority on the Internet. From 2019 through 2023, she headed public policy for Meta in the Asia-Pacific region, and brings 20 years of experience in shaping technology regulations in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. She is a visiting policy fellow at Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford. Edika Amin is a senior analyst specializing at PS-engage on content regulation and serving as the Content Workstream Secretariat for the Asia Internet Coalition (AIC), an industry body for technology, transport and e-commerce companies operating in Asia. Previously, Edika worked in the international department of Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), where he engaged with international multilateral institutions such as the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the World Bank Office in Kuala Lumpur and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). |
|||||||||||||||
If you need assistance to find a suitable speaker to contribute to your session, or an onsite facilitator for your online-only session, please specify your request with details of what you are looking for. | |||||||||||||||
Not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Please declare if you have any potential conflict of interest with the Program Committee 2024. | |||||||||||||||
No | |||||||||||||||
Are you or other session contributors planning to apply for the APrIGF Fellowship Program 2024? | |||||||||||||||
Yes | |||||||||||||||
APrIGF offers live transcript in English for all sessions. Do you need any other translation support or any disability related requests for your session? APrIGF makes every effort to be a fully inclusive and accessible event, and will do the best to fulfill your needs. | |||||||||||||||
Not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Number of Attendees (Please fill in numbers) | |||||||||||||||
Gender Balance in Moderators/Speakers (Please fill in numbers) | |||||||||||||||
Consent | |||||||||||||||
![]() |